Savage v. Nadler

Alabama Court of Appeals

Savage v. Nadler

182 So. 80, 28 Ala. App. 212, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 134

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 5, 1938

Docket7 Div. 349.

StatusPublished

This text of 182 So. 80 (Savage v. Nadler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Savage v. Nadler, 182 So. 80, 28 Ala. App. 212, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 134 (Ala. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

■This appeal is from a judgment in favor of appellees in a suit brought against them, on an alleged joint contract, by appellant.

The case was tried by the court, sitting, without a jury. The rules of review are too well known to need re-statement.

The pleas were “in short by consent.” We are not sure that we understand, exactly, what is meant by that; but the issues that were litigated are simple and not difficult of comprehension from the record.

Appellees denied any joint contract; and claimed that all amounts due appellant by Mrs. Leak had been paid.

The evidence was in conflict; and we see no occasion to overturn the judgment rendered.

It is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI