Savage v. Maresch

Washington Territory

Savage v. Maresch

21 P. 386, 3 Wash. Terr. 259, 1887 Wash. Terr. LEXIS 57

Washington Territory·Decided January 19, 1887·Published

Opinions

Mr. Justice Hoyt

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a case at law. There has been a total disregard of the provisions of rule 5 of this court, as there has been no attempt made to file or serve an assignment of error as therein required; and as appellant does not ask to be relieved from the consequences of his default, the motion to dismiss the appeal herein must be granted.

Turner, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Hoyt

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a case at law. There has been a total disregard of the provisions of rule 5 of this court, as there has been no attempt made to file or serve an assignment of error as therein required; and as appellant does not ask to be relieved from the consequences of his default, the motion to dismiss the appeal herein must be granted.

Turner, J., concurred.

Savage v. Maresch, 21 P. 386, 3 Wash. Terr. 259, 1887 Wash. Terr. LEXIS 57 (Wash. Super. Ct. 1887).

Pincite

21 P. 386 (Savage v. Maresch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.