Savage v. Hicks

2 Wend. 246
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1829·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court, Marcy, J.

The” plaintiff has not been irregular. An order to stay proceedings after the case was settled not having been obtained, the plaintiff had a right to, enter judgment and issue execution. The case, however, having been made in good faith, the proceedings on the execution are stayed until the decision of the cause.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Savage v. Hicks, 2 Wend. 246 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).

2 Wend. 246 (Savage v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jellinghaus v. New York Insurance
5 Bosw. 678 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1860)