Savage v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
85 S.E. 675, 16 Ga. App. 537, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 113
Opinion
This being the first grant of a new trial, and it not being made to appear that the judge abused his discretion, or that the law and facts required the verdict rendered, the judgment will not be disturbed by the Court of Appeals. Civil Code, § 6204. Even if the evidence required a verdict for the plaintiff, it can not he said that a finding for the exact amount of the verdict rendered was demanded in such a sense that the exercise of the discretion of the trial judge upon that point was precluded. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Savage v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad, 85 S.E. 675, 16 Ga. App. 537, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 113 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).
85 S.E. 675 (Savage v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robinson v. MODERN COACH CORPORATION
85 S.E.2d 826 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)