Savad v. Arluck
This text of 227 A.D. 795 (Savad v. Arluck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, the order to provide that appellant have leave to intervene in this action. Although the order to show cause obtained by appellant did not in terms ask leave to intervene, such leave was asked for in her affidavit and the order to show cause contained a prayer for general relief. We think, therefore, that this court may cure the irregularity in question and permit appellant to intervene. In our opinion, the direction to pay taxes, water rates, etc., contained in the order appointing respondent receiver, is mandatory. (Frankenstein v. Hamburger, 73 App. Div. 352.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Seeger and Seudder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
227 A.D. 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/savad-v-arluck-nyappdiv-1929.