Sautter v. Utica City National Bank
119 A.D. 898, 104 N.Y.S. 1139
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1907·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
.Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Rogers, J„ delivered, at Special '. Term. (Reported in 45 Misc. Rep. 15.) All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., . and Kruse, J., who dissented in ah opinion by McLennan, P. J..
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sautter v. Utica City National Bank, 119 A.D. 898, 104 N.Y.S. 1139 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).
119 A.D. 898 (Sautter v. Utica City National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People ex rel. Economus v. Coakley
110 Misc. 385 (New York Supreme Court, 1920)