Sautbine v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Sautbine v. Pierce

1954 OK 47, 266 P.2d 1006, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 434

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 9, 1954

DocketNo. 35832

StatusPublished

This text of 1954 OK 47 (Sautbine v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sautbine v. Pierce, 1954 OK 47, 266 P.2d 1006, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 434 (Okla. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

CORN, Justice.

Plaintiff in error has appealed from a judgment entered in favor of defendant in the trial court and on April 18, 1953 plaintiff in error filed his brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allega[1007]*1007tions of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances as stated by this court in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okl. 583, 99 P.2d 498, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause will be reversed and remanded, with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded with directions to vacate the judgment entered for defendant in the trial court and to grant a new trial.

HALLEY, C. J., JOHNSON, V. C. J., and WELCH, DAVISON, O’NEAL, WILLIAMS and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CORN, Justice.

Plaintiff in error has appealed from a judgment entered in favor of defendant in the trial court and on April 18, 1953 plaintiff in error filed his brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allega[1007]*1007tions of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances as stated by this court in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okl. 583, 99 P.2d 498, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause will be reversed and remanded, with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded with directions to vacate the judgment entered for defendant in the trial court and to grant a new trial.

HALLEY, C. J., JOHNSON, V. C. J., and WELCH, DAVISON, O’NEAL, WILLIAMS and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1954 OK 47, 266 P.2d 1006, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sautbine-v-pierce-okla-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack