Saunders v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

776 So. 2d 369, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 946, 2001 WL 85518
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 2, 2001·No. No. 5D00-2010·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, appellant is appearing pro se. Because the merits have been difficult to ascertain from appellant’s pro se brief, we ordered the record to examine. Upon review of the record, we find the appeal referee’s decision is supported by the evidence submitted. Appellant has offered in his brief additional facts that may have affected the outcome of the case, but this court cannot consider such matters. Our consideration is limited to a review of the existing record.

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, C.J., HARRIS, and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saunders v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 776 So. 2d 369, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 946, 2001 WL 85518 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

776 So. 2d 369 (Saunders v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parker v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION
41 So. 3d 1090 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)