Saunders v. Stinson Canning Co.
This text of 518 A.2d 725 (Saunders v. Stinson Canning Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
The Plaintiff, W. Bruce Saunders, appeals from a judgment adverse to him in a jury-waived trial in Superior Court (Knox County) in his action for breach of contract against the Defendant, Stinson Canning Company. He alleged, but the Superior Court did not find, that the Defendant had breached its 1977 contract by failing to deliver certain equipment. The Plaintiff had the burden of proving the breach he alleged. The evidence adduced at trial, however, did not compel the trial court to find a breach of his contract by the Defendant.
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
518 A.2d 725, 1986 Me. LEXIS 950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saunders-v-stinson-canning-co-me-1986.