Saunders v. Stewart

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Saunders v. Stewart

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 359

CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina

DecidedFebruary 24, 1732

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 359 (Saunders v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saunders v. Stewart, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 359 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1732).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon Hearing Council on both Sides, It is the Opinion of this Court, That the Devise of Lambert Saunders of the Negroes to Samuel Saunders, and [360]*360the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten, is a good Devise in Law; They being thereby absolutely Vested in the said Samuel his Executors etc. and the Remainder over Voyd; Therefore the Demurrer in this case, is Allowed and the Bill dismisst, with Costs to be paid by the Complainant.

Sup Demurr.

Friday 25th February 1731 [1732].

Present as Yesterday.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon Hearing Council on both Sides, It is the Opinion of this Court, That the Devise of Lambert Saunders of the Negroes to Samuel Saunders, and [360]*360the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten, is a good Devise in Law; They being thereby absolutely Vested in the said Samuel his Executors etc. and the Remainder over Voyd; Therefore the Demurrer in this case, is Allowed and the Bill dismisst, with Costs to be paid by the Complainant.

Sup Demurr.

Friday 25th February 1731 [1732].

Present as Yesterday.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saunders-v-stewart-ctchansc-1732.