Saunders v. Stephenson

47 So. 783, 94 Miss. 676
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 47 So. 783 (Saunders v. Stephenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saunders v. Stephenson, 47 So. 783, 94 Miss. 676 (Mich. 1909).

Opinion

Fletcher, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The affidavit, iipon which the note sued on was probated, was not made by the creditor, but by her husband as her agent. [678]*678This brings the question squarely within the holding of this court in McWhorter v. Donald, 39 Miss. 779, 80 Am. Dec. 97. It is true that appellant here offers some excuse for not making the affidavit which the statute requires, and also triie that this ■ excuse was wanting in the McWhorter case; but the decision is that case is based upon the peremptory requirement of the statute, a departure from which is fatal. Cheairs v. Cheairs, 81 Miss. 662, 33 South. 414; Walker v. Nelson, 87 Miss. 268, 39 South. 809. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bankston v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Vicksburg
171 So. 18 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1936)
Jennings v. Lowery Berry
112 So. 692 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1927)
Dakota National Bank v. Kleinschmidt
144 N.W. 934 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 So. 783, 94 Miss. 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saunders-v-stephenson-miss-1909.