Saunders v. State
381 S.W.3d 376, 2012 WL 4513654, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1216
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Jewell Saunders, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Saunders v. State, 381 S.W.3d 376, 2012 WL 4513654, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1216 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
381 S.W.3d 376 (Saunders v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.