Saunders v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Saunders v. State

83 S.E. 148, 15 Ga. App. 344, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 101

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 20, 1914

Docket5831

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 83 S.E. 148 (Saunders v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saunders v. State, 83 S.E. 148, 15 Ga. App. 344, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 101 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, J.

1. The proof was sufficient to sustain the verdict of guilty, and there is no substantial merit in the assignments of error.

2. A charge to the jury as to-theeomparative weight or probative value of . positive and negative testimony was clearly authorized by the evidence, and the charge given on that subject was sufficiently full. Wood v. State, 9 Ga. App. 365 (71 S. E. 500); Lyens v. State, 133 Ga. 588 (2), 594 (66 S. E. 792).

3. If any fuller or more explicit charge was desired on any feature of the case, a request therefor should have been submitted in writing.

Judgment affirmed.

Roan, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI