Saunders v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Saunders v. State

238 So. 2d 680

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 25, 1970·No. No. 69-996·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of the crime of rape for which he was sentenced to life imprisonment, in September of 1966. Subsequently he filed in the trial court a motion for relief under Rule 1.850 CrPR, 33 F.S.A. asserting a number of grounds. The order denying that motion was appealed to this court, and affirmed (217 So.2d 134). This appeal is from an order of the trial court denying a second motion for relief under Rule 1.850 CrPR, containing basically the same grounds of attack as the first, for which reason no error was committed by the trial court in denying the motion. See Marshall v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 723.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of the crime of rape for which he was sentenced to life imprisonment, in September of 1966. Subsequently he filed in the trial court a motion for relief under Rule 1.850 CrPR, 33 F.S.A. asserting a number of grounds. The order denying that motion was appealed to this court, and affirmed (217 So.2d 134). This appeal is from an order of the trial court denying a second motion for relief under Rule 1.850 CrPR, containing basically the same grounds of attack as the first, for which reason no error was committed by the trial court in denying the motion. See Marshall v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 723.

Affirmed.

Saunders v. State, 238 So. 2d 680 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

238 So. 2d 680 (Saunders v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related