Saunders v. Quigg

3 A. 814, 112 Pa. 546, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 310
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 19, 1886·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered April 19th, 1886.

Per Curiam:

The surrender Joy the insolvent of himself to jail was a valid surrender. It was a strict compliance with the alternative condition of the bond. No objection was made to the sufficiency of the jurat when the petition was presented, and no motion at any time was made to dismiss the petition loy reason of any alleged defect therein. After it has answered its purpose, and the obligee in the bond, based on the validity of the petition, has accepted the bond and brought suit thereon, it is too late for such an obligee to recover by showing the jurat to the petition was not properly administered.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saunders v. Quigg, 3 A. 814, 112 Pa. 546, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 310 (Pa. 1886).

3 A. 814 (Saunders v. Quigg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Algoma Coal & Coke Co. v. Alexander
66 S.E.2d 201 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1950)
Noyes v. Perkins
152 A. 405 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1930)
Wolfe v. McDevitt
65 Pa. Super. 543 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Marks v. Willenski
31 Pa. Super. 177 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
Stout v. Quinn
9 Pa. Super. 179 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)
Williams v. Thacker Coal & Coke Co.
44 W. Va. 599 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1898)
Greenwaldt v. Kraus
24 A. 67 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1892)
Saunders v. Perkins
21 A. 257 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1891)
Saunders v. Smith
19 A. 54 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1890)
Keim v. Saunders
13 A. 710 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1888)
Betz v. Greenwaldt
6 Sadler 139 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1887)