Saunders v. Quantrell

206 So. 2d 645
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 31, 1968
DocketNo. 36654
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 206 So. 2d 645 (Saunders v. Quantrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saunders v. Quantrell, 206 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The District Court of Appeal, First District, has certified to us that its decision in Gilliam v. Saunders, 200 So.2d 588, passes upon a question of great public interest.

We have carefully considered the question posed in said decision and conclude that the dissenting opinion of Judge Wigginton (text page 591) correctly answers the question. Since his dissent fully expresses our views we will not further elaborate, but adopt his opinion as our answer to the question.

Accordingly, the majority opinion and the decision of the District Court in the cause are quashed with direction that Judge Wig-ginton’s opinion be substituted in lieu thereof.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dawson v. Saada
608 So. 2d 806 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Lowman v. Young
212 So. 2d 88 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 So. 2d 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saunders-v-quantrell-fla-1968.