Saunders v. Pendleton
33 A. 222, 19 R.I. 292, 1895 R.I. LEXIS 101
Opinion
The court is of the opinion that though the declaration is technically defective in form, it contains a substantial statement of the plaintiff’s cause of action, and that the defendant’s motion to dismiss, after having pleaded the general issue, comes too late and should not have been granted.
Plaintiff’s petition for a new trial granted, and case remitted to the Common Pleas Division for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Saunders v. Pendleton, 33 A. 222, 19 R.I. 292, 1895 R.I. LEXIS 101 (R.I. 1895).
33 A. 222 (Saunders v. Pendleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wallace v. Wallace
130 A. 116 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1925)