Saunders v. Pendleton

33 A. 222, 19 R.I. 292, 1895 R.I. LEXIS 101
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedNovember 22, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 A. 222 (Saunders v. Pendleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saunders v. Pendleton, 33 A. 222, 19 R.I. 292, 1895 R.I. LEXIS 101 (R.I. 1895).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court is of the opinion that though the declaration is technically defective in form, it contains a substantial statement of the plaintiff’s cause of action, and that the defendant’s motion to dismiss, after having pleaded the general issue, comes too late and should not have been granted.

Plaintiff’s petition for a new trial granted, and case remitted to the Common Pleas Division for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wallace v. Wallace
130 A. 116 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 A. 222, 19 R.I. 292, 1895 R.I. LEXIS 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saunders-v-pendleton-ri-1895.