Saunders v. Pendleton
This text of 33 A. 222 (Saunders v. Pendleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court is of the opinion that though the declaration is technically defective in form, it contains a substantial statement of the plaintiff’s cause of action, and that the defendant’s motion to dismiss, after having pleaded the general issue, comes too late and should not have been granted.
Plaintiff’s petition for a new trial granted, and case remitted to the Common Pleas Division for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 A. 222, 19 R.I. 292, 1895 R.I. LEXIS 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saunders-v-pendleton-ri-1895.