Saunders v. Nichols

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 13, 2009
• Docket: 09-6307
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6307

ANTONIO SAUNDERS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

SGT. NICHOLS; OFFICER DIXON,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

JOHN DOE CLASSIFICATION OFFICERS; JANE DOE CLASSIFICATION OFFICERS; JOHN DOE OFFICERS, defendants are being sued each in their individual and official capacities,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01160-LMB-TCB)

Submitted: October 2, 2009 Decided: October 13, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Antonio Saunders appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Saunders v. Nichols, No. 1:08-cv-01160-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va.

filed Jan. 22, 2009; entered Jan. 23, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED