Saunders v. Lay

Fourth Circuit

Saunders v. Lay

478 F. App'x 20

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 12, 2012·No. No. 12-6883·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward Harold Saunders, Jr. appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Saunders v. Lay, No. 5:11-cv-00566-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward Harold Saunders, Jr. appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Saunders v. Lay, No. 5:11-cv-00566-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Saunders v. Lay, 478 F. App'x 20 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

478 F. App'x 20 (Saunders v. Lay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related