Saunders v. Lamanna

Fourth Circuit

Saunders v. Lamanna

345 F. App'x 871

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 2, 2009·No. No. 09-6349·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward Harold Saunders, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Saunders v. LaManna, No. 8:08-cv-03333-GRA, 2009 WL 363752 (D.S.C. filed Feb. 9, 2009 & entered Feb. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward Harold Saunders, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Saunders v. LaManna, No. 8:08-cv-03333-GRA, 2009 WL 363752 (D.S.C. filed Feb. 9, 2009 & entered Feb. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Saunders v. Lamanna, 345 F. App'x 871 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

345 F. App'x 871 (Saunders v. Lamanna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related