Saunders v. Ireland

Texas Supreme Court

Saunders v. Ireland

28 S.W. 271, 87 Tex. 316, 1894 Tex. LEXIS 464

Texas Supreme Court·Decided November 22, 1894·No. No. 489.·Published

Opinion

CAIRES, Chibe Justice.

As we understand the testimony of the defendant in the application, John Ireland had paid as surety for his principal the amount which he sought to recover of the latter at the time the writ of attachment was issued. We think he then had a right of action for the debt so paid. It is therefore unnecessary that we should decide whether or not the applicant was in a position to dispute the validity of his claim.

The application is refused.

Application refused.

Delivered November 22, 1894.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CAIRES, Chibe Justice.

As we understand the testimony of the defendant in the application, John Ireland had paid as surety for his principal the amount which he sought to recover of the latter at the time the writ of attachment was issued. We think he then had a right of action for the debt so paid. It is therefore unnecessary that we should decide whether or not the applicant was in a position to dispute the validity of his claim.

The application is refused.

Application refused.

Delivered November 22, 1894.

Saunders v. Ireland, 28 S.W. 271, 87 Tex. 316, 1894 Tex. LEXIS 464 (Tex. 1894).

Pincite

28 S.W. 271 (Saunders v. Ireland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.