Saunders v. Ireland
This text of 28 S.W. 271 (Saunders v. Ireland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As we understand the testimony of the defendant in the application, John Ireland had paid as surety for his principal the amount which he sought to recover of the latter at the time the writ of attachment was issued. We think he then had a right of action for the debt so paid. It is therefore unnecessary that we should decide whether or not the applicant was in a position to dispute the validity of his claim.
The application is refused.
Application refused.
Delivered November 22, 1894.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 S.W. 271, 87 Tex. 316, 1894 Tex. LEXIS 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saunders-v-ireland-tex-1894.