Saunders v. Gilmer
This text of 8 Tex. 295 (Saunders v. Gilmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
That the sheriff of the county in which suit was properly instituted was authorized to serve process oil all tiie defendants found in his county, wherever they were alleged to reside, cannot admit of a question.
Tiie case of Ward v. Lattimer, (2 Tex. R., 245,) cited by the plaintiffs in error, was unlike tiie present. In that case botli defendants resided in the county where suit was instituted, and the citation was served on one of them in a different county. The ease therefore presented a very different question from the present.
Judgment affirmed, with damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Tex. 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saunders-v-gilmer-tex-1852.