Saunders v. Eaton

107 So. 367, 91 Fla. 108, 1926 Fla. LEXIS 863
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 23, 1926·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record, of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Brown, C. J., and Ellis and Strum, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saunders v. Eaton, 107 So. 367, 91 Fla. 108, 1926 Fla. LEXIS 863 (Fla. 1926).

107 So. 367 (Saunders v. Eaton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.