Saunders v. Dickerson

Fourth Circuit

Saunders v. Dickerson

313 F. App'x 665

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2009·No. No. 08-7268·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Saunders appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Saunders v. Dickerson, No. 1:07-cv-01094-LMB, 2008 WL 2543428 (E.D. Va. June 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Saunders appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Saunders v. Dickerson, No. 1:07-cv-01094-LMB, 2008 WL 2543428 (E.D. Va. June 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Saunders v. Dickerson, 313 F. App'x 665 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

313 F. App'x 665 (Saunders v. Dickerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related