Saunders v. Crosby

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Saunders v. Crosby

135 A. 914, 126 Me. 589, 1927 Me. LEXIS 96

DecidedJanuary 5, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 135 A. 914 (Saunders v. Crosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saunders v. Crosby, 135 A. 914, 126 Me. 589, 1927 Me. LEXIS 96 (Me. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

This action was begun by an attorney at law to recover for professional services averred to have been rendered by him in behalf of the son of the defendant on the promise of the latter that she would pay the attorney for what in virtue of his retainer he might do.

The verdict was for the defendant.

Neither the usual-form motion by the plaintiff that the verdict be set aside as plainly wrong on the facts and in law, nor the record accompanying the motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence, is sufficient to purpose.

Both motions are hereby overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This action was begun by an attorney at law to recover for professional services averred to have been rendered by him in behalf of the son of the defendant on the promise of the latter that she would pay the attorney for what in virtue of his retainer he might do.

The verdict was for the defendant.

Neither the usual-form motion by the plaintiff that the verdict be set aside as plainly wrong on the facts and in law, nor the record accompanying the motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence, is sufficient to purpose.

Both motions are hereby overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 A. 914, 126 Me. 589, 1927 Me. LEXIS 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saunders-v-crosby-me-1927.