Saunders v. Collins

62 Fla. 273
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 15, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 62 Fla. 273 (Saunders v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saunders v. Collins, 62 Fla. 273 (Fla. 1911).

Opinion

Per Curiam

— This writ of error was taken to a judgment awarding damages for trespass upon real property alleged to belong to S. G. Collins. The right of Collins to maintain the action is based upon a tax deed issued March 8th, 1904. The deed was issued upon a tax sale certificate of December 1901.

Section 8 of Chapter 4888, which became effective September 1st, 1901, now Section 574, of the General Statutes of 1906, provides that “No tax deeds for lands sold for taxes shall issue until the Clerk of the Circuit Court shall have given at least thirty days previous notice of the application for a deed by publishing the same once a week in some newspaper in the County” &c. The proof shows that the publication began February 12th, 1904, and the deed was issued March 8th, 1904. The mandatory provision-as to publication being intended for the benefit of the land owner and not being complied with, the tax deed is void. See Clark Ray Co. v. Williford decided this term.

The introduction of the deed was not objected to on this ground, but such objection would have been unavailing since the tax deed is by the statute made prima facie evidence of the regularity of the proceedings. Saunders v. Collins 56 Fla. 534, 47 South. Rep. 958.

The tax deed was properly admitted in evidence over the objections made to its introduction, but this did not debar the defendants of the right to over come the prima [275]*275facie effect of tbe tax deed by showing its invalidity by proper evidence as was done when it was made to appear •without objection that the publication of the notice of the application for the tax deed was not made for thirty days as required by the mandatory provisions of the statute.

The judgment is reversed.

Whitfield, C. J. and Taylor, Shackleford, Cockrell and Hocker, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Locke v. Stuart
113 So. 2d 402 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
The Ozark Corp. v. Pattishall
185 So. 333 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Coult v. McIntosh Investment Co.
182 So. 594 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Tax Securities Corp. v. Borland
137 So. 151 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Fla. 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saunders-v-collins-fla-1911.