Saunders v. City of Petersburg Police Department

Fourth Circuit

Saunders v. City of Petersburg Police Department

108 F. App'x 102

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 1, 2004·No. No. 04-1713·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Earnestine Saunders appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Saunders v. City of Petersburg Police Dep’t, No. CA-03-697-3 (E.D.Va. May 11, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Earnestine Saunders appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Saunders v. City of Petersburg Police Dep’t, No. CA-03-697-3 (E.D.Va. May 11, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Saunders v. City of Petersburg Police Department, 108 F. App'x 102 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

108 F. App'x 102 (Saunders v. City of Petersburg Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related