Saunders v. Bernard

11 Ill. App. 514
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedOctober 24, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 Ill. App. 514 (Saunders v. Bernard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saunders v. Bernard, 11 Ill. App. 514 (Ill. Ct. App. 1882).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was a garnishee proceeding commenced before a justice of the peace by Lippincott and Cox, judgment creditors of E. P. Saunders, against Thomas Bernard. Judgment was rendered against the garnishee, Thomas Bernard, in favor of E. P. Saunders, use of Lippincott and Cox. E. P. Saunders took an appeal to the Circuit Court of Clinton county. In that court a motion was made by Lippincott and Cox to dismiss the appeal. The motion was allowed and the appeal dismissed. The case is now brought to this court by appeal, and the error assigned is that the court erred in dismissing the appeal taken by E. P. Saunders.

Ho bill of exceptions was taken in the case, and therefore the question attempted to be raised on this record can not be considered.

Motions and exceptions to the ruling of the court thereon should be preserved by bill of exceptions as they can not otherwise become a part of the record. Reed v. Horne, 73 Ill. 598; Hyatt et al. v. Brown et al. 82 October 24, 1882. 28.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reilly v. Chicago City Ry. Co.
90 Ill. App. 364 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Ill. App. 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saunders-v-bernard-illappct-1882.