Saunders v. A Better Blind, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Saunders v. A Better Blind, Inc.

954 So. 2d 755, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6635, 2007 WL 1263969

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 2, 2007·No. No. 06-2912·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order denying the appellants’ motion to dismiss or transfer the action on account of improper venue. Because the complaint alleges that the overt act in furtherance of the alleged conspiracy, see Lipsig v. Ramlawi, 760 So.2d 170, 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), occurred in Miami-Dade County, it follows that Miami-Dade County is a permissible venue. See § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2006); Lane v. Hemophilia of the Sunshine State, Inc., 793 So.2d 992, 995-96 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Straske v. McGillicuddy, 388 So.2d 1334, 1336 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); see also Tucker v. Fianson, 484 So.2d 1370, 1371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order denying the appellants’ motion to dismiss or transfer the action on account of improper venue. Because the complaint alleges that the overt act in furtherance of the alleged conspiracy, see Lipsig v. Ramlawi, 760 So.2d 170, 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), occurred in Miami-Dade County, it follows that Miami-Dade County is a permissible venue. See § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2006); Lane v. Hemophilia of the Sunshine State, Inc., 793 So.2d 992, 995-96 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Straske v. McGillicuddy, 388 So.2d 1334, 1336 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); see also Tucker v. Fianson, 484 So.2d 1370, 1371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Affirmed.

Saunders v. A Better Blind, Inc., 954 So. 2d 755, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6635, 2007 WL 1263969 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

954 So. 2d 755 (Saunders v. A Better Blind, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related