Saunders v. A Better Blind, Inc.

954 So. 2d 755, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6635, 2007 WL 1263969
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 2, 2007
DocketNo. 06-2912
StatusPublished

This text of 954 So. 2d 755 (Saunders v. A Better Blind, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saunders v. A Better Blind, Inc., 954 So. 2d 755, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6635, 2007 WL 1263969 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order denying the appellants’ motion to dismiss or transfer the action on account of improper venue. Because the complaint alleges that the overt act in furtherance of the alleged conspiracy, see Lipsig v. Ramlawi, 760 So.2d 170, 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), occurred in Miami-Dade County, it follows that Miami-Dade County is a permissible venue. See § 47.011, Fla. Stat. (2006); Lane v. Hemophilia of the Sunshine State, Inc., 793 So.2d 992, 995-96 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Straske v. McGillicuddy, 388 So.2d 1334, 1336 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); see also Tucker v. Fianson, 484 So.2d 1370, 1371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Straske v. McGillicuddy
388 So. 2d 1334 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Lane v. HEMOPHILIA OF THE SUNSHINE STATE INC.
793 So. 2d 992 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Lipsig v. Ramlawi
760 So. 2d 170 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Tucker v. Fianson
484 So. 2d 1370 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
954 So. 2d 755, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6635, 2007 WL 1263969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saunders-v-a-better-blind-inc-fladistctapp-2007.