Saunders, A. v. Northampton Co. CCP
This text of Saunders, A. v. Northampton Co. CCP (Saunders, A. v. Northampton Co. CCP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
ANTONIO SAUNDERS, : No. 140 MM 2020 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT OF : COMMON PLEAS, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 3rd day of November, 2020, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process, the “Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition,” and the “Writ of
Habeas Corpus Petition” are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa.
2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is impermissible). The Prothonotary is
DIRECTED to forward the filings to present counsel of record. See Commonwealth v.
Saunders, CP-48-CR-0000538-2019 (order filed Sept. 4, 2020) (appointing Robert
Patterson, Esquire, as Petitioner’s new counsel).
Finally, the Prothonotary is DIRECTED to provide courtesy copies of this Court’s
order to the Superior Court, as well as to Attorney Robert Eyer, who had been
representing Petitioner in the pending direct appeal. Commonwealth v. Saunders, 684
EDA 2020.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Saunders, A. v. Northampton Co. CCP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saunders-a-v-northampton-co-ccp-pa-2020.