Sauls v. Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.
This text of 375 S.W.3d 263 (Sauls v. Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Jeffrey Sauls appeals from the award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission’s decision is supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence. Berwin v. Lindenwood Female College, 205 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
375 S.W.3d 263, 2012 WL 3668002, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sauls-v-pinnacle-entertainment-inc-moctapp-2012.