Sauls v. Hardee Farms & Ranch, Inc.

198 So. 99, 144 Fla. 437
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 15, 1940
StatusPublished

This text of 198 So. 99 (Sauls v. Hardee Farms & Ranch, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sauls v. Hardee Farms & Ranch, Inc., 198 So. 99, 144 Fla. 437 (Fla. 1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On appeal, appellants challenge the action of the chancellor in closing the time for taking testimony and refusing to open or extend the time for taking testimony beyond the date theretofore fixed by the order of the chancellor.

They also challenge the sufficiency of the testimony to support the decree of the chancellor.

We have examined the record in the light of the briefs and find no reversible error. 1

The decree is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Whitfield, Brown, Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Chapman, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 So. 99, 144 Fla. 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sauls-v-hardee-farms-ranch-inc-fla-1940.