Saulnier's Estate
3 Whart. 442, 1838 Pa. LEXIS 203
Opinion
A husband has no peculiar right to administration of his wife’s separate estate; and the interference of the husband here is to be disregarded. Even had he been entitled, his negligence in the assertion of his right would be a waiver of it; and he could not now prevent it from devolving on another. A wife’s creditors are not bound to wait forever. There is no personal objection to the appellee; and we cannot say the Orphans’ Court erred in refusing to repeal the letters of administration.
Decree affirmed.
Cited by Counsel, 7 Watts, 565.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Saulnier's Estate, 3 Whart. 442, 1838 Pa. LEXIS 203 (Pa. 1838).
3 Whart. 442 (Saulnier's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Criswell v. Altemus
7 Watts 565 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1838)