Saulnier's Estate

3 Whart. 442, 1838 Pa. LEXIS 203
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 9, 1838
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Whart. 442 (Saulnier's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saulnier's Estate, 3 Whart. 442, 1838 Pa. LEXIS 203 (Pa. 1838).

Opinion

Pur Curiam.

A husband has no peculiar right to administration of his wife’s separate estate; and the interference of the husband here is to be disregarded. Even had he been entitled, his negligence in the assertion of his right would be a waiver of it; and he could not now prevent it from devolving on another. A wife’s creditors are not bound to wait forever. There is no personal objection to the appellee; and we cannot say the Orphans’ Court erred in refusing to repeal the letters of administration.

Decree affirmed.

Cited by Counsel, 7 Watts, 565.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Criswell v. Altemus
7 Watts 565 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1838)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Whart. 442, 1838 Pa. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saulniers-estate-pa-1838.