Saulnier v. Mueller

185 N.E.2d 918, 345 Mass. 760, 1962 Mass. LEXIS 940
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 1, 1962·Published

Opinion

Exceptions overruled. The trial judge correctly directed verdicts for the defendants in this action to recover damages arising from the female plaintiff’s fall on the front steps of the defendants’ house. [761] Even if it be assumed, without deciding, that the female plaintiff was an invitee rather than a social visitor (compare Taylor v. Goldstein, 329 Mass. 161, 163-165, with Pandiscio v. Bowen, 342 Mass. 435, 437 — 438), there was no evidence which would warrant finding negligence on the part of the defendants, either in any unusual construction of the defendants’ stairs or in the defendants’ conduct prior to the accident. See Peacock v. Ambassade Realty Corp. 336 Mass. 115, 117-118; St. Rock v. Gagnon, 342 Mass. 722, 723-724.

Joseph R. Nolan for the plaintiffs. Robert B. Callahan (Kenneth A. Currie with him) for the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saulnier v. Mueller, 185 N.E.2d 918, 345 Mass. 760, 1962 Mass. LEXIS 940 (Mass. 1962).

185 N.E.2d 918 (Saulnier v. Mueller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pandiscio v. Bowen
173 N.E.2d 634 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1961)
St. Rock v. Gagnon
175 N.E.2d 361 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1961)
Peacock v. Ambassade Realty Corp.
142 N.E.2d 775 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1957)
Taylor v. Goldstein
107 N.E.2d 14 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1952)