Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Saulnier v. Barthel

Saulnier v. Barthel

63 A.D.3d 817, 880 N.Y.S.2d 520
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 9, 2009
StatusPublished

This text of 63 A.D.3d 817 (Saulnier v. Barthel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saulnier v. Barthel, 63 A.D.3d 817, 880 N.Y.S.2d 520 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J.), entered September 28, 2007, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against her dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The sole contention raised by the plaintiff is that the court committed reversible error by striking one of her answers on cross-examination as nonresponsive. This issue is unpreserved for appellate review (see Doyle v Nusser, 288 AD2d 176 [2001]; Ritz v Lee, 273 AD2d 291 [2000]). Mastro, J.E, Miller, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ritz v. Lee
273 A.D.2d 291 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Doyle v. Nusser
288 A.D.2d 176 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 A.D.3d 817, 880 N.Y.S.2d 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saulnier-v-barthel-nyappdiv-2009.