Sauleck v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Sauleck v. State

1910 OK CR 81, 108 P. 1134, 3 Okla. Crim. 645, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 229

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided April 12, 1910·No. No. A-639.·Published

Opinion

PEE CTTBIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Pittsburg county for a violation of the prohibition law, and was on the 13th day of January, 1910, sentenced to serve a term of 30 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $50, from which judgment he appealed by filing in this court on March 5, 1910, petition in error with case-made attached. Now, on this 13th day of April, 1910, plaintiff in error files his motion to dismiss said appeal. Wherefore it is by the court ordered that said appeal be, and is hereby, dismissed, and the case remanded, with direction to the county court of Pittsburg county to cause the judgment and sentence to be carried into execution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CTTBIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Pittsburg county for a violation of the prohibition law, and was on the 13th day of January, 1910, sentenced to serve a term of 30 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $50, from which judgment he appealed by filing in this court on March 5, 1910, petition in error with case-made attached. Now, on this 13th day of April, 1910, plaintiff in error files his motion to dismiss said appeal. Wherefore it is by the court ordered that said appeal be, and is hereby, dismissed, and the case remanded, with direction to the county court of Pittsburg county to cause the judgment and sentence to be carried into execution.

Sauleck v. State, 1910 OK CR 81, 108 P. 1134, 3 Okla. Crim. 645, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 229 (Okla. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

1910 OK CR 81 (Sauleck v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.