Saul Sanchez-Carrizales v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 3, 2021·No. 10-21-00016-CR·Published

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-21-00016-CR

SAUL SANCHEZ-CARRIZALES, Appellant v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 13th District Court Navarro County, Texas Trial Court No. D39396-CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Saul Sanchez-Carrizales, appealed the trial court’s judgment of

conviction. He now moves to dismiss the appeal and requests the prompt issuance of

this Court’s mandate. Appellant and his attorney have signed the request. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.2(a).

Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. However,

because there is no indication in the motion that the State agrees to or there is good cause

for the early issuance of the Court’s mandate as required by Rule 18.1(c), that request is denied in part and granted in part. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1(c) (“The mandate may be

issued earlier if the parties so agree, or for good cause on the motion of a party.”). While

the immediate issuance of the mandate with the opinion and judgment is denied, the

Clerk of this Court is ordered to issue the mandate in this proceeding on February 10,

2021, unless the State timely files an objection to the early issuance thereof.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Neill, and Justice Johnson Motion to dismiss appeal granted Motion to issue mandate denied in part and granted in part Opinion delivered and filed February 3, 2021 Do not publish [CR25]

Sanchez-Carrizales v. State Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saul Sanchez-Carrizales v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Saul Sanchez-Carrizales v. State (Saul Sanchez-Carrizales v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.