Saul Cuevas v. James Hartley
835 F.3d 892, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14266, 2016 WL 4136977
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Saul Cuevas v. James Hartley. Read the opinion of the Court — 674 F. App'x 724 →
Opinions
Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI
[893] ORDER
Because of the complexity of this case and its procedural history, including the fact that the original brief answered a short pro se filing, the “Application to File an Oversized Replacement Answering Brief’ is GRANTED. The brief tendered July 25, 2016, is ordered filed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Saul Cuevas v. James Hartley, 835 F.3d 892, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14266, 2016 WL 4136977 (9th Cir. 2016).
835 F.3d 892 (Saul Cuevas v. James Hartley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sophia Daire v. Mary Lattimore
812 F.3d 766 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)