Saul Cuevas v. James Hartley
835 F.3d 892, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14266, 2016 WL 4136977
This text of 835 F.3d 892 (Saul Cuevas v. James Hartley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Saul Cuevas v. James Hartley, 835 F.3d 892, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14266, 2016 WL 4136977 (9th Cir. 2016).
Opinions
Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI
[893]*893ORDER
Because of the complexity of this case and its procedural history, including the fact that the original brief answered a short pro se filing, the “Application to File an Oversized Replacement Answering Brief’ is GRANTED. The brief tendered July 25, 2016, is ordered filed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sophia Daire v. Mary Lattimore
812 F.3d 766 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
835 F.3d 892, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14266, 2016 WL 4136977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saul-cuevas-v-james-hartley-ca9-2016.