Saul Augusto Ojeda Egui v. Department of Revenue, Child Support Program

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 20, 2024
Docket3D2024-0183
StatusPublished

This text of Saul Augusto Ojeda Egui v. Department of Revenue, Child Support Program (Saul Augusto Ojeda Egui v. Department of Revenue, Child Support Program) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saul Augusto Ojeda Egui v. Department of Revenue, Child Support Program, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed November 20, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D24-183 Lower Tribunal Nos. 2001864218, 13230002145FC ________________

Saul Augusto Ojeda Egui, Appellant,

vs.

Department of Revenue, Child Support Program, et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the State of Florida Department of Revenue, Child Support Program.

Saul Augusto Ojeda Egui, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General and Toni C. Bernstein, Sr. Assistant Attorney General (Tallahassee), for appellee Florida Department of Revenue.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and MILLER and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Chavez v. Dep’t of Revenue, Child Support Program, 49 Fla. L. Weekly D1756, D1756 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 21, 2024) (“Although the

Father provided his financial information to the Department, he did not

request an administrative hearing and therefore failed to fully participate in

the proceedings below. By waiving his right to a hearing, the Father waived

his ability to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the

Department's determination of his child support obligations.”); see also §

742.10(4), Fla. Stat. (2024) (“[A] signed voluntary acknowledgment of

paternity shall constitute an establishment of paternity and may be

challenged in court only on the basis of fraud, duress, or material mistake of

fact, with the burden of proof upon the challenger . . . .”); § 742.18(1), Fla.

Stat. (2024) (“[E]stablish[ing] circumstances under which a male may

disestablish paternity or terminate a child support obligation when the male

is not the biological father of the child.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Saul Augusto Ojeda Egui v. Department of Revenue, Child Support Program, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saul-augusto-ojeda-egui-v-department-of-revenue-child-support-program-fladistctapp-2024.