Saugstad v. Vicky's Car City, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Saugstad v. Vicky's Car City, Inc.

447 So. 2d 228, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19756

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 1, 1983·No. No. 82-2692·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As to the dismissal of Count II of appellant’s complaint, we cannot find that the argument raised by appellant was preserved for appeal. In any event, as to both Count I and Count II, there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the trial court’s determinations, which are entitled to a presumption of correctness. Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977).

AFFIRMED.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and SCHOON-OVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

As to the dismissal of Count II of appellant’s complaint, we cannot find that the argument raised by appellant was preserved for appeal. In any event, as to both Count I and Count II, there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the trial court’s determinations, which are entitled to a presumption of correctness. Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977).

AFFIRMED.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and SCHOON-OVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Saugstad v. Vicky's Car City, Inc., 447 So. 2d 228, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19756 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

447 So. 2d 228 (Saugstad v. Vicky's Car City, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related