Saugstad v. Vicky's Car City, Inc.
This text of 447 So. 2d 228 (Saugstad v. Vicky's Car City, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As to the dismissal of Count II of appellant’s complaint, we cannot find that the argument raised by appellant was preserved for appeal. In any event, as to both Count I and Count II, there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the trial court’s determinations, which are entitled to a presumption of correctness. Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
447 So. 2d 228, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saugstad-v-vickys-car-city-inc-fladistctapp-1983.