Saugstad v. Vicky's Car City, Inc.

447 So. 2d 228, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19756
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 1, 1983
DocketNo. 82-2692
StatusPublished

This text of 447 So. 2d 228 (Saugstad v. Vicky's Car City, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saugstad v. Vicky's Car City, Inc., 447 So. 2d 228, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19756 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As to the dismissal of Count II of appellant’s complaint, we cannot find that the argument raised by appellant was preserved for appeal. In any event, as to both Count I and Count II, there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the trial court’s determinations, which are entitled to a presumption of correctness. Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977).

AFFIRMED.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and SCHOON-OVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herzog v. Herzog
346 So. 2d 56 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
447 So. 2d 228, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saugstad-v-vickys-car-city-inc-fladistctapp-1983.