Saufley v. State
This text of 90 S.W. 640 (Saufley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This conviction was for violating the local option law, the penalty imposed being a fine of $50 and thirty days confinement in the county jail. The original motion for new trial was filed and overruled on August 7, 1905; and the recognizance was entered into on the same day. Subsequently the amended motion for new trial was filed, on August 19, 1905—twelve days after the appeal was perfected, to this court; and consequently the amended motion cannot be considered. The original motion merely insists that the evidence is not sufficient. In our opinion the evidence amply supports the finding of the court. There are no bills of exception in the record. No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
ON REHEARING.
December 20, 1905.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 S.W. 640, 48 Tex. Crim. 563, 1905 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saufley-v-state-texcrimapp-1905.