Sauers v. Tate

1898 OK 80, 54 P. 452, 7 Okla. 211, 1898 Okla. LEXIS 22
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJuly 30, 1898
StatusPublished

This text of 1898 OK 80 (Sauers v. Tate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sauers v. Tate, 1898 OK 80, 54 P. 452, 7 Okla. 211, 1898 Okla. LEXIS 22 (Okla. 1898).

Opinion

Opinion pf the court by

McAtee, J.:

No briefs have been filed in this cause, and since it is provided in the rules of practice in this court (rule 4, 5 Okla., v.) that “counsel shall file ten printed briefs in each case,” and by rule 6, “In each civil case, counsel for plaintiff in error shall furnish a copy of his brief,” etc., and, “in case of the failure to comply with the requirements of this1 rule, the court may continue, or dismiss the case, or affirm or reverse the judgment,” the case will therefore be dismissed for failure to file briefs in the case in compliance with the rule.

All of the -Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1898 OK 80, 54 P. 452, 7 Okla. 211, 1898 Okla. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sauers-v-tate-okla-1898.