Sauerbry v. State
511 S.W.3d 469, 2017 WL 769815, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 100
Opinion
Order
Jeffrey Sauerbry appeals the motion court’s denial, following a hearing, of his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15. Sauerbry argues that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion in that he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel failed to object to certain testimony at trial. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sauerbry v. State, 511 S.W.3d 469, 2017 WL 769815, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 100 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).
511 S.W.3d 469 (Sauerbry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.