Sauerborn v. . the New York Cent. Hudson River Rd. Co.
36 N.E. 343, 141 N.Y. 553, 1894 N.Y. LEXIS 1176
Opinion
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Bartlett, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sauerborn v. . the New York Cent. Hudson River Rd. Co., 36 N.E. 343, 141 N.Y. 553, 1894 N.Y. LEXIS 1176 (N.Y. 1894).
36 N.E. 343 (Sauerborn v. . the New York Cent. Hudson River Rd. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harper v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
22 A.D. 273 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)