Sauer v. State

236 S.W. 721, 90 Tex. Crim. 596, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 39
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 18, 1922
DocketNo. 6613.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 236 S.W. 721 (Sauer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sauer v. State, 236 S.W. 721, 90 Tex. Crim. 596, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 39 (Tex. 1922).

Opinion

EATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the county court of Colorado County of a misdemeanor, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50.

In order for the jurisdiction of this court to attach upon appeal, it is made necessary by statute that a recognizance or appeal bond be entered into by the accused. Forms for such obligations are to be found in articles 918-919 of Vernon’s C. C. P. In the instant case our Assistant Attorney General moves to dismiss the appeal herein because the law in the above particular has not been complied with. An examination of the record discloses that the motion is well taken. There appears in this record an ordinary appearance bond.

The motion of the State is sustained, and the appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Staten v. State
246 S.W. 387 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 S.W. 721, 90 Tex. Crim. 596, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sauer-v-state-texcrimapp-1922.