Sauer v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

88 N.Y.S. 865
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 23, 1904·Published

Opinion

MacLEAN, J.

An employe of the plaintiff, driving northerly in a covered wagon, with back obstructed by a leather curtain, and on the easterly track of the defendant, for about the distance of a block, unnecessarily, without looking back, • and being struck in the rear by a north-bound car as he was turning to the southwest corner of Twelfth street and said avenue, the owner may not complain for damages to his property, for his driver was negligent. Hill v. Met. St. Ry. Co., 30 Misc. Rep. 440, 62 N. Y. Supp. 596. The complaint was properly dismissed. Reynolds v. Larchmont Horse R. Co., 83 App. Div. 189, 82 N. Y. Supp. 185.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sauer v. Interurban Street Railway Co., 88 N.Y.S. 865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

88 N.Y.S. 865 (Sauer v. Interurban Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reynolds v. Larchmont Horse Railway Co.
83 A.D. 189 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Hill v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
30 Misc. 440 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)