Sauer v. Interurban Street Railway Co.
This text of 88 N.Y.S. 865 (Sauer v. Interurban Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An employe of the plaintiff, driving northerly in a covered wagon, with back obstructed by a leather curtain, and on the easterly track of the defendant, for about the distance of a block, unnecessarily, without looking back, • and being struck in the rear by a north-bound car as he was turning to the southwest corner of Twelfth street and said avenue, the owner may not complain for damages to his property, for his driver was negligent. Hill v. Met. St. Ry. Co., 30 Misc. Rep. 440, 62 N. Y. Supp. 596. The complaint was properly dismissed. Reynolds v. Larchmont Horse R. Co., 83 App. Div. 189, 82 N. Y. Supp. 185.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 N.Y.S. 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sauer-v-interurban-street-railway-co-nyappterm-1904.