Sauer v. . City of New York

73 N.E. 1132, 181 N.Y. 521, 1905 N.Y. LEXIS 795
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 14, 1905·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion to recall and amend remittitur. (See 180 N. Y. 27.)

Motion granted and remittitur is amended by adding thereto the following: “ And the constitutionality of the statute (L. 1887, ch. 570) under which the improvement complained of in this action was made, having been challenged, we hold (1) that said statute does not violate the State Constitution; (2) that it does not offend against the provision of the fourteenth amendment of the Federal Constitution, providing that a person shall not be deprived of property without due process of law, and (3) that it does not contravene section 10 of article 1 of the Federal Constitution forbidding the impairment of the obligations of a contract.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sauer v. . City of New York, 73 N.E. 1132, 181 N.Y. 521, 1905 N.Y. LEXIS 795 (N.Y. 1905).

73 N.E. 1132 (Sauer v. . City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dumala v. State
72 Misc. 2d 687 (New York State Court of Claims, 1973)