Saud v. Arzumanian

745 So. 2d 544, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16548, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2716
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 8, 1999·No. No. 99-1059·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks certiorari review of a non-final order granting disqualification of counsel. We have jurisdiction. Arcara v. Philip M. Warren, P.A., 574 So.2d 325 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

Rule 4-1.9 of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the Florida Bar, upon which respondent relied in seeking disqualification of petitioner’s counsel, Lawrence Bunin, provides in part:

A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter:
(a) represent another person in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person’s interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client unless the former client consents after consultation.

Although Mr. Bunin did previously represent respondent on two matters, we conclude that they were neither the same nor substantially related. We therefore grant [545]*545the petition and quash the order of disqualification.

FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur. POLEN, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saud v. Arzumanian, 745 So. 2d 544, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16548, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2716 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

745 So. 2d 544 (Saud v. Arzumanian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Legion Ins. Co. v. Bank of America, NA
807 So. 2d 690 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Palmer v. State
775 So. 2d 404 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)