Saucier v. Willis

656 So. 2d 252, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8956, 1995 WL 348298
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 12, 1995
DocketNo. 94-3041
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 656 So. 2d 252 (Saucier v. Willis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saucier v. Willis, 656 So. 2d 252, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8956, 1995 WL 348298 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

ERVIN, Judge.

The trial court abused its discretion in restricting visitation between appellant and his son “[bjased on the child’s youth.” Kerr v. Kerr, 486 So.2d 708 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). And see Ketola v. Ketola, 636 So.2d 850 (Fla. 1st DCA) (section 61.13(2)(b)l, Florida Statutes, abolished the “tender years” doctrine), review dismissed, 649 So.2d 233 (Fla.1994). We therefore reverse and remand with directions for the lower court to grant liberal visitation to appellant.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

MINER and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adamson v. Chavis
672 So. 2d 624 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
656 So. 2d 252, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8956, 1995 WL 348298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saucier-v-willis-fladistctapp-1995.