Saucedo v. State
This text of 2018 ND 2 (Saucedo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 1/22/18 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2018 ND 2
Joe Ramon Saucedo, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20170224
Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Donald Hager, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Kiara C. Kraus-Parr (argued), Grand Forks, ND, for petitioner and appellant.
Jodi A. Bass (argued), Carmell F. Mattison (on brief), Assistant State’s Attorneys, and Jenna Bergman (on brief), third-year law student, under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellee.
Saucedo v. State
[¶1] Joe Saucedo appeals from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Saucedo argues the district court erred in denying his application for post-conviction relief because his counsel was ineffective. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not clearly err in denying Saucedo’s application.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jon J. Jensen
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2018 ND 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saucedo-v-state-nd-2018.